juicy
canon 300d
canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6
Comments:

GODDAMN RIGHT!!

Posted by tim at July 15, 2004 09:44 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I swear those pants might as well read "dumbass".

Posted by Davin at July 15, 2004 10:08 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

...or read "My other ass is comfortable."

Posted by rooks at July 15, 2004 10:26 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Don't think of a monkey, don't think of a monkey.

Swerve

Posted by at July 15, 2004 11:28 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I never understood pants with writing on the ass...

Posted by photojunkie at July 15, 2004 12:11 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

As stupid as this girl probably is, c'mon, drop the shit - SHE'S HOT AS FUCK!!

Posted by tim at July 15, 2004 12:28 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I see no reason to think she's stupid.

Swerve

Posted by Swerve at July 15, 2004 05:48 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

do you think it says "fruit" on the front?

Posted by Jim Green at July 16, 2004 02:27 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

First of all, the presumption that she'd be stupid and dumb is just so sad to hear. A woman cant be sexy and smart and the same time?? Let go of the jealousy guys, its not making you look good.
Second of all, she is damn hot! The juice is well worth the squeeze here!!!

Posted by jens at July 16, 2004 06:07 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Er, I don't think you should be addressing the guys in one fell swoop there. Only one dumbass on this page called her stupid. The other comments were about how stupid it *looks* to wear the word "juicy" on your ass.

Despite the asspants, she may be hot, and she may be smart, but there's nothing smart or hot about wearing the word "juicy" on your ass. I look at this picture and I just think "wow, that's so stupid".

Posted by matto at July 16, 2004 06:22 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Are you looking at my girlfriend's ass?

Posted by nantel at July 17, 2004 06:59 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Not just looking, publishing.

Posted by matto at July 17, 2004 07:04 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hi Matto,

Aaah, subjectivity.

I find the word Juicey printed on this woman's pants to be provocative.

Mind you, if every man/woman in Toronto started wearing words on their butts, i think i would tire of it quickly.

Brand Spanking New Day, it is.


Swerve

Posted by Swerve at July 17, 2004 09:50 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

okidok, i was to quick to judge, pardon! indeed pardon.
But i still thinks it both cute and provocative to have 'Juicy' written on ones ass. When i showed this pic to my girl she was like "I want!!! Where can i get a pair???"
I see it as a win-win situation...

best regards //jens :)

Posted by jens at July 17, 2004 10:14 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hehe... marketing GENIUS. ;-) Jokes aside, regardless of how you feel about it, everyone notices it. Some people LOVE it and some people HATE it. But everyone responds to it. Sounds like a successful product to me.

Posted by saadiq at July 20, 2004 11:45 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The other night I was at a show and saw a girl wearing a t-shirt which read "Super size me" across her less then ample chest. I can't help but wonder about girls who wear clothing like the pants pictured in this photograph. I don't find it provocative, cute or very attractive, but rather insulting. I wish someone would have the heart to tell these girls that they are demeaning themselves. Thatís my opinion anyway.

Posted by conrad at July 23, 2004 02:50 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The strangest pair of asspants spotted in South Carolina read "Spider". Now, figure that one out. Loved your shot.

Posted by Mark at July 31, 2004 04:55 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

No wonder, Gabriel Garcia Maequez used to said, that a big ... of a women can moved the world,
(remember the nose of Hellen of Troy).

Posted by Antonio at August 4, 2004 01:52 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

That's Britney Spears.

Posted by Mike at August 9, 2004 10:38 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

it's great that these pants started the biggest line of comments i've noticed, yet.

"juicy" is a clothing line. a pretty "fashionable" clothing line. you can all get yourself a pair of those in the mall if you'd like.

Posted by tricia at September 8, 2004 04:52 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

juicy is a label dumbasses and i agree britney is pretty stupid

Posted by Stacey at April 3, 2005 10:42 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i HAVE 5 JUICY OUTFITS AND i LOVE THEM! jUICY rULES

Posted by n at April 27, 2005 09:57 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

thats me u assholes, i'll fuck any1 of you just call me up.

Posted by Danielle at May 10, 2005 07:29 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

JUst let it say "LOOK AT MY PUSSY"

Posted by sam at August 21, 2005 04:13 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

you now, I have a T-shirt with " Belgian chocolate addict" on it
Is that provocative??

Posted by Delphine at August 22, 2007 09:18 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

that's britney spears. and the pants are from juicy couture, i have them. all of their stuff says juicy. its not meant to be provacative you losers. maybe if you would all step outside of the trailor youre living in and go to a high end designer store you would know that.

Posted by leela fashionista at April 12, 2008 12:46 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leela that crap is not high end designer wear. Juicy couture is slut wear, nothing more.

Posted by Jack Smith at January 25, 2009 02:45 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ok. Since everyone seems to have their own opinion about this picture then i will input my own. Collectively skimming through all of the other posts about this picture, i seem to be a little confused. I see nothing wrong with a wannabe fad. having writing on the ass of her pants is nothing more than a "now" byproduct. "juicy" meaning Juicy Couture. Being that someone is saying its Britney Spears, that narrows the justification down as to why these pants are even being discussed. HELLO. I grew up about 45 miles from her. i know the reasonings. yet i do not feel that its a mainstream "to-do" to have pants with writing on the ass. no its not provocative in the least. its only provocative to people who make it that way. the reasoning for the pants is mainly for pictures like this and conversations like these. If anyone hasnt sat down and realized it yet. ITS NOT THAT SERIOUS. let the girl wear her pants, live her life, and leave it alone.

Posted by Justin at September 20, 2009 02:58 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i effing love juicy:)

Posted by jessikah at May 5, 2010 04:41 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .



Sorry, commenting has been disabled.

« previous      (navigate comments)      next »