stance
canon 10D
canon 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 is
Comments:

Wow, confusing light. Almost looks like she's chromakeyed into the scene.

Posted by Davin at July 25, 2004 09:37 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

yeah, it's really weird. it was late in the day, with sun breaking through clouds, and various obstructions, and she looked amazing, like she had her own spotlight. i played with the contrast and dodged herlegs a little, but not much! i can't really figure out why her legs are so bright compared to the guy next to her. i guess he's just in her shadow, and wearing black pants.

Posted by matto at July 25, 2004 09:51 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i would be scared to take this pic, as she would probably come over and kick my butt! great attitude and shot matto. i love how she is in her own light as you say and is rightfully the center of attention. ;-)

Posted by your_waitress at July 25, 2004 04:13 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

great shot, I like the guy coming in on the left, his body outline looks like its actually cut out of the brick wall

Posted by Jim Green at July 26, 2004 02:43 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

wow, great shot. the glasses and the brick wall are captivating. awesome.

Posted by Chris at July 26, 2004 09:29 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

~she does not look happy with the lens pointing in her direction, which makes the shot IMHO, more of a spy shot than a candid street shot...the frame seems a bit askew, tilting down and to the right, could be easily fixed with PShop~

Posted by btezra at July 26, 2004 10:08 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

thanks for the comments. btezra, she had that look long before I lifted the camera. That's why I took the shot.

Posted by matto at July 26, 2004 10:28 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Wonderful. I love the way the various disparate elements come together here.

Posted by djn1 at July 26, 2004 10:41 AM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Yeah, she definitely has a kick your ass look. What was she scowling at if not you, Matto?

Posted by MattB at July 28, 2004 04:48 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Matt... it's true, i swear! i think her stance had something to do with the fella beside her.

As for scanners: best bang for buck is probably the nikon coolscan v, at least from everything i've read. it's the only one i've used apart from the coolscan iv, and it's definitely an improvement over that one. minolta's are apparently pretty good too. stay away from canon i think. send me an email if you'd like any pointers, film scanning is a whole world of its own.

Posted by matto at July 28, 2004 09:37 PM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .



Sorry, commenting has been disabled.

« previous      (navigate comments)      next »